azade bavakhani; Mohamadhosein yarmohamadian; narges keshtiaray
Volume 14, Special Issue , July 2020, , Pages 83-94
Abstract
This research was conducted with the aim of explaining the native revision of the curriculum of Teacher Education University based on the life experiences of professors based on the experiences of professors in 1397. In this research, a qualitative phenomenological method has been used. The criterion ...
Read More
This research was conducted with the aim of explaining the native revision of the curriculum of Teacher Education University based on the life experiences of professors based on the experiences of professors in 1397. In this research, a qualitative phenomenological method has been used. The criterion for estimating sample size (n = 9) was the theoretical saturation principle. The statistical population consisted of all professors of Education University among whom 9 professors who had experience of group leadership or participation in revision projects were selected through purposive sampling of exceptional or boundary type. Data collection was done using semi-structured interview and analyzed by subject coding method. From the findings of this research, after removing the common codes, 379 conceptual codes were extracted which illustrates the experiences of professors in identifying the stages of the development of the native version of the curriculum revision of the Teacher Education University. In the context of indigenous curriculum revision preparations, the three main components of curriculum induction publishing, internal publishing and external publishing, and seven sub-components were categorized. findings suggest that the study, taking into account local and local contexts, explained the publication of a native curriculum review based on internal and external factors of publication and the expression of opportunities and requirements.
